British Policies
British Policies in India
British Policies
Subsidiary Alliance
- Definition: A political strategy adopted by the British East India Company to extend its control over Indian states without direct annexation.
- Purpose: To ensure the loyalty of Indian rulers and secure access to military and economic resources.
- Key Features:
- Indian rulers were required to accept British military protection.
- They had to maintain a British commander-in-chief within their territory.
- They were not allowed to form alliances with other powers.
- They had to pay for the maintenance of British troops.
- Impact:
- Weakened the sovereignty of Indian states.
- Enabled the British to expand their influence gradually.
- Examples:
- Nawab of Awadh (1801): Joined the subsidiary alliance.
- Nizam of Hyderabad (1798): Became a protectorate under the British.
- Key Date: 1798 – Subsidiary Alliance system formalized by Lord Wellesley.
- Exam Fact: Subsidiary Alliance is a frequently asked topic in SSC and RRB exams, often linked with the tenure of Lord Wellesley.
Ring of Fence
- Definition: A policy of encircling Indian states with British-controlled territories to isolate and contain them.
- Objective: To prevent the rise of a powerful Indian state that could challenge British supremacy.
- Implementation:
- British established control over key regions around the Indian subcontinent.
- This included the annexation of territories like Punjab, Awadh, and parts of the Deccan.
- The British used military force and political manipulation to achieve this.
- Effect:
- Created a buffer zone around British-controlled areas.
- Reduced the ability of Indian states to form alliances or resist British expansion.
- Key Date: 1848 – The annexation of Punjab marked a significant step after second Anglo-Sikh war.
- Exam Fact: The Ring of Fence is often associated with the British strategy to consolidate power and is a common topic in competitive exams.
Doctrine of Lapse
- Definition: A policy introduced by Lord Dalhousie to annex Indian states that lacked a male heir.
- Purpose: To expand British territorial control and eliminate potential rivals.
- Key Provisions:
- If a ruler died without a male heir, the state would be annexed by the British.
- The doctrine applied to both Hindu and Muslim states.
- It was used to justify the annexation of various princely states.
- Examples:
- Satara (1848): Annexed due to the death of the ruler without a male heir.
- Jhansi (1854): Annexed after Rani Lakshmibai’s death.
- Tanjore (1855): Annexed under the doctrine.
- Impact:
- Caused widespread resentment among Indian rulers and subjects.
- Contributed to the growing discontent that led to the First Anglo-Afghan War and the Indian Rebellion of 1857.
- Key Date: 1848 – Doctrine of Lapse introduced by Lord Dalhousie.
- Exam Fact: The Doctrine of Lapse is a crucial topic for SSC and RRB exams, often linked with the Revolt of 1857 and the tenure of Lord Dalhousie.
Comparison Table
| Policy | Purpose | Key Features | Impact on Indian States | Key Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subsidiary Alliance | Ensure loyalty and military access | Military protection, British commanders | Weakened sovereignty, expanded control | 1801 |
| Ring of Fence | Contain and isolate Indian states | Buffer zones, military encirclement | Reduced alliance potential | 1848 |
| Doctrine of Lapse | Expand British territory | Annexation without male heir | Caused resentment, led to Revolt 1857 | 1848 |